SQL Server hosting in the cloud has rapidly gained momentum in the wave of digital transformation. This debate on SQL Server on AWS vs Azure has its reasons, such as its numerous benefits for users.

But the server has some challenges, too. One of the dilemmas is the choice of platform between the two powerful contenders, AWS and Azure, as they are both leaders in the field.

The top two competitors in this space are AWS and Azure, which offer reliable and robust infrastructure for SQL Server hosting. Yet, we can not ignore the set of crucial differences they possess.

This blog is going to unveil the complexities of this choice. Here, you will learn to weigh the pros and cons of each platform for SQL Server hosting. Let’s begin!

The Landscape of Cloud Database Hosting

Cloud database hosting has emerged as a critical part of modern businesses. Its offerings and qualities have made the technology an integral part of an organization’s IT infrastructure. But it gets technical when choosing between SQL Server AWS vs Azure cloud provider. 

This is where several key considerations take the charge. These include many factors, from the provider’s security measures to compliance with data protection to scalability. And, of course, the level of technical support offered.

Business performance is directly proportional to the right provider. Therefore, let’s perform a comparative analysis of these key considerations.

Comparative Analysis: SQL Server on AWS vs Azure

AWS and Microsoft Azure are two leading participants in the cloud services market. But both of them offer distinct features for SQL Server hosting.

AWS is a feature-rich, scalable, and reliable platform for SQL Server hosting. Its prominent qualities involve Amazon RDS and EC2 instances. RDS is an easy-to-use service that assists with time-consuming administration tasks. On the other hand, EC2 instances render high customization options.

Coming to Azure, its SQL Server hosting capabilities are rooted in its Azure SQL Database service. This offers a fully scalable, managed, and intelligent relational database service. It provides automatic updates, advanced threat detection, and robust data protection.

Furthermore, Azure’s Elastic Pool aids in managing and optimizing several databases. Again, this is what maximizes resource utilization and reduces costs. As a result, both platforms feature the scalability and reliability of SQL Server hosting solutions.

AWS on AWS SQL Server pricing offers greater customization and manual control of instances. On the other hand, Azure focuses on ease of use and intelligent automation.

Performance Metrics and Scalability

When evaluating the performance metrics of SQL Server on AWS vs Azure, SQL Server on AWS wins an edge. It delivers quick data processing and shorter response times, regardless of workload. It also offers multiple storage options, all with its unique performance metrics.

Azure shows an impressive performance profile for SQL Server as well. Its robust computing power and wide array of configurations enable efficient database management. Secondly, Azure’s monitoring tools optimize SQL Server performance to drive improved operational efficiency.

Scalability is a prominent need in database management. Due to the seamless scaling capabilities, AWS shines in this aspect. It authorizes businesses to scale their operations without worrying about infrastructure constraints.

In the same way, Azure provides scalable solutions for SQL Server. It supports automatic scaling options. This reduces the need for manual intervention. Azure’s scalability benefits businesses by helping them to adapt quickly to fluctuating workloads.


Confused About SQL Server on AWS vs Azure?

Picking the right cloud database for your business can be difficult. Our knowledgeable consultants can assist you in choosing the best service to meet your needs. Reach out so we can help find the ideal solution.

Cost Implications of SQL Server on AWS vs Azure

Hosting SQL Server on AWS and Azure involves distinct cost structures. Here is the description of how. AWS charges for SQL Server hosting depend on numerous aspects. Also, there is a comparison of Azure vs AWS SQL Server pricing available.

For cost comparison, the instance type or the region is important. It also depends on whether you opt for on-demand or reserved instances. Know that on-demand instances offer flexibility and per-hour charges. However, it may cost more in the long run. Meanwhile, reserved instances require a one-time payment for a specific period. They potentially provide significant discounts.

Azure’s pricing model for SQL Server hosting revolves around Database Transaction Units (DTUs). You pay for a bundle of resources – CPU, memory, and storage. The cost increases with the DTU level. There’s also a serverless option, where you pay per second of usage.

The cost of optimization means understanding usage patterns. Regular evaluation of resource utilization can lead to potential savings. For instance, if a server is underutilized during off-peak hours, you could scale down resources for that period.

On the other hand, you should scale up to maintain performance if resources are stretched during peak times. The analysis of the respective patterns can ensure cost-effectiveness without compromising on service.

Data Security and Compliance

SQL Server on AWS takes pride in its robust data security features. You can encrypt data at rest and in transit. Amazon encrypts connections and enhances security. Tools like AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) help the users control who can manage AWS resources.

Azure for SQL Server also prioritizes data security. It offers Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) for at-rest data. In addition to that, Azure Active Directory authenticates and authorizes users. Precisely what reduces potential security threats.

Ensuring data security is crucial. AWS and Azure have certifications guaranteeing their data centers are up to mark with strict security standards. They also comply with HIPAA. This safeguards sensitive patient health information.

When comparing SQL Server on AWS vs Azure, AWS and Azure provide secure environments for SQL Server hosting. They are great, offering excellent data security features. Hence, it ensures safe storage and transfer of sensitive information.

Plus, their compliance with global and industry-specific standards further polishes their reliability. So, whether you choose Azure or AWS, you can stay confident in the security of your data.

Decision-Making Framework

Now, when you have gone through multiple differences describing the idea of SQL Server on AWS vs Azure, you must have become aware of how crucial the decision is. To decide between AWS and Azure for SQL Server hosting, consider the server’s scalability first. 

Both AWS and Azure offer scalable solutions, but your specific needs may favor one over the other. Besides that, security is another key consideration. So, better review the security measures each platform provides. This is to confirm whether they align with your company’s requirements.

Additionally, do not forget to evaluate the pricing models of both platforms. The total cost may vary significantly depending on your usage pattern and selected features.

Lastly, take the learning curve and support into consideration. While both platforms offer comprehensive support, your team’s existing expertise may make one option more appealing.

Consider this decision-making framework as a guide. It acknowledges that every business has unique needs and priorities.


Can Folio3 Help You Choose Between AWS and Azure?

Don’t let fear hold your business back. Our consultants can help you choose the right tech platform. Embrace the challenge – explore new possibilities with us. Ready to step up and harness these powerful tools?


Despite the availability of multiple cloud providers, choosing the right platform for your SQL Server hosting can be daunting, especially if we are to select one from SQL Server on AWS vs Azure.

They all affect the decision, from efficiency to safety to the overall performance of a business’s data management systems. However, regardless of these differences, the choice between AWS and Azure ultimately depends on the user’s specific needs. And their organizational conditions, too. So, utilize this guide to choose between AWS and Azure for SQL Server hosting.

  • Frequently Asked Questions

    Q1. What Is the Difference Between Azure SQL and AWS?

    Azure SQL and AWS are Microsoft and Amazon’s cloud computing services, respectively. However, they have notable differences. Azure SQL is a fully managed relational database service based on the latest stable version of Microsoft SQL Server, providing seamless integration with other Microsoft products. In contrast, AWS offers a broader range of services, with Amazon RDS as its relational database service.

    Q2. Is SQL Server Supported on AWS?

    AWS offers various options to run SQL Server on the cloud, including Amazon RDS and Amazon EC2. Amazon RDS manages time-consuming database administration tasks so users can focus on their applications and business. Besides that, Amazon EC2 provides the flexibility to run SQL Server, offering complete control over the Windows server hosting your SQL Server instance.

    Q3.What Is the Difference Between Azure SQL and Azure SQL Server?

    The difference between Azure SQL vs SQL Server is that Azure SQL Database and SQL Server on Azure are two different services for managing databases in the cloud. SQL Database is a fully managed service, while SQL Server on Azure VMs offers more control. Hence, the SQL Server on AWS vs Azure are different.

    Q4. Is SQL Server Cheaper on Azure?

    SQL Server on Azure can be a cost-effective solution compared to on-premises deployments. With Microsoft’s Azure hybrid benefit and reserved Instance pricing, businesses can save significantly. The pay-as-you-go model removes upfront costs. This provides flexibility to scale resources as needed.